The Wenatchee World Online
DOT may shelve bridge projects after projected $214 million gas-tax drop
By Jay Patrick
World staff writer
Posted August 05, 2008

WENATCHEE — Construction projects to make roads safer and ease traffic congestion could get shelved because of a projected $214 million shortfall in gas-tax revenues from 2007 to 2011, blamed on high gas prices.



State Department of Transportation officials in Olympia are in the midst of an across-the-board evaluation to determine which projects slated to be paid for with gas-tax money should go ahead as planned, which should be postponed and which should be canceled. There simply isn't enough money coming in to cover what the DOT had planned on spending.


Three projects in the next three years to improve traffic flow on and around the Sen. George Sellar Bridge and one to build a new high-volume corridor on Sunset Highway in East Wenatchee are among the projects under review, said Jeff Adamson, DOT spokesman for North Central Washington.


The bridge projects are estimated at $52.7 million, and the Eastside corridor work is expected to cost $43 million.


"Anything not yet started is up in the air," Adamson said.


With record-high gas prices, people are driving less. That translates to less gas-tax money for an agency that was already strapped before fuel prices went sky high. The reprioritization of pending projects started in the latter half of July, said agency spokeswoman Melanie Coon.


A dismal June revenue forecast projecting total revenues in the 2007-09 budget to come in at $4.13 billion prompted the statewide evaluation. In February, DOT financial analysts pegged the anticipated revenue total for the 2007-09 biennium at $4.21 billion. Revenues during the 2009-11 biennium are projected at $4.42 billion, according to the forecast conducted in June. That's $137 million less than was forecast in February.


"It is very bleak," said Elmira Forner, vice-chair of the state Transportation Commission and a Manson resident. The commission sets DOT policy. "If the revenue keeps declining, there is no way we can finish all the projects we have."


"This affects our projects immediately in the fact that cash flow is reduced," said Adamson. "It could all slow down."


The slide was well under way last fall when the agency cut its forecasted 2007-09 revenue by 3.2 percent. The state Legislature in January approved changes in the timing of some projects to help mitigate the downturn.


"We continue to make adjustments, but operational costs continue to increase and fuel prices have gone beyond what anyone could predict," reads a line from a sheet of talking points recently distributed to DOT public relations personnel and obtained by The World. "We're in the process of looking at the new forecast and will develop programmatic adjustment options for consideration by the governor and Legislature as part of the budget process, as we head into the second half of the biennium and into next year."


The financial squeeze could result in funding being shifted from some pending projects to others, but Coon said Monday she doesn't expect any jobs already planned to be scrapped altogether. Some could be put off, while others may be completed in phases rather than in a single shot.


"At this point we're having to be as creative as possible," she said.


Results of the evaluation are expected next month, Coon said.


Jay Patrick: 664-7155


patrick@wenworld.com



COMMENTS

You must be registered and logged in to post a comment. Register or Log in

 

Kevin, perception is everything.
...and your statement that "Everyone knows is usually code word for not having a clue" is pretty much right...I should have said me and my friends.
Don Ribbs | Aug 6, 2008 8:03 pm | Request Removal
Well, Don, you'd be wrong....

"Everyone knows" is usually code word for not having a clue but wanting to make an emotional guess anyway.

Think of it this way, when HWY 28 between here and Quincy is reworked, if we were strictly relying on monies from us locally, that'd be a pretty hefty tax bill because there really aren't that many of us over here. Traffic is relatively light on that road compared to an awful lot of the roads in the Seattle/Bellevue area and they have a lot more folks paying the taxes into the system.

The complaints about us subsidizing the westside are mostly just emotional rants. Some years we will, some years we won't. In the past we've mostly received more than we've paid, but lately it's evened up some.
Kevin L | Aug 6, 2008 1:53 pm | Request Removal
I agree with Kevin that this side of the mountains gets the same amount....
if the mountains start on the eastside of I-5. Everyone knows that those taxes were designed to lessen congestion around the Seattle area, not the George Sellar bridge....
Don Ribbs | Aug 5, 2008 10:02 pm | Request Removal
Kathryn, each side of the mountains gets very close to the same amount of money for road projects as they pay in in taxes, some years a little more, some a little bit less. In the past we have been more on the receiving side than the giving side, though.

I think the article said that it was an "across the board" review, not that any of the local projects were cancelled, delayed, or other just yet.
Kevin L | Aug 5, 2008 8:23 pm | Request Removal
The money we pay in taxes goes to improve the roads on the westside, so can you really expect that they'd break lose of some of the money to help the eastside? Maybe if those making the decisions for us from Olympia came and hung around at around 4:30 on the Sellars Bridge, they'd see that there is a real problem here for us - and maybe shelve some of THEIR projects!! (Yeah, and well see pigs fly....)
Kathryn Henry | Aug 5, 2008 5:59 pm | Request Removal
maybe they could restripe bridge into 5 lanes, there are 5 lanes at Wenatchee side of bridge already and maybe can we live with narrower lanes on bridge to save several million dollars and traffic tie ups? sometimes more money is not always the answer.
None None | Aug 5, 2008 4:48 pm | Request Removal
POST A COMMENT (limit 5,000 characters)
   

Some readers using Firefox 3 for their browser have had problems posting comments. Until this is resolved, please use an alternate browser if you are experiencing this problem.

Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

© The World Publishing Company


Send a news tip
Place a classified ad
Publish your photos
Add an event to the calendar
Subscribe to The World